PRISMPIXEL

THE ARCHIVE — THE 20,000 FORMULATIONS

20,000 Formulations.15 Years.One Vision.

The untold story of 19,700 failures and the 300 breakthroughs that created PrismPixel Glass™

SCROLL THE YEARS

ITHE TIMELINE

Sixteen calendar years. Fifteen years of work. Every node is a year of panes.

Red is what was scraped off. Gold is what stayed on the glass. Hover or touch a year to open its ledger; the ratio above each node is the cumulative success rate at that point in the journey.

FAILED BATCHES BREAKTHROUGHS

0.00%

2009

420 batches

0 breakthroughs

0.00%

2010

780 batches

0 breakthroughs

0.04%

2011

1,040 batches

1 breakthrough

0.09%

2012

1,180 batches

2 breakthroughs

0.13%

2013

1,320 batches

3 breakthroughs

0.18%

2014

1,410 batches

5 breakthroughs

0.25%

2015

1,460 batches

8 breakthroughs

0.33%

2016

1,600 batches

11 breakthroughs

0.42%

2017

1,620 batches

15 breakthroughs

0.53%

2018

1,580 batches

21 breakthroughs

0.67%

2019

1,540 batches

27 breakthroughs

0.82%

2020

1,480 batches

34 breakthroughs

1.00%

2021

1,400 batches

42 breakthroughs

1.21%

2022

1,320 batches

51 breakthroughs

1.42%

2023

1,290 batches

56 breakthroughs

1.50%

2024

560 batches

24 breakthroughs

2009

BATCHES FM-00001 → FM-00420

The first pane went opaque on the first pass. Everything after that was learning what light refuses.

BATCHES THIS YEAR

420 sprayed · 420 scraped · 0 kept

PARTICLE TYPES TESTED

Glass microspheres · Talc · Kaolin clay · Calcium carbonate

NANOPARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS

18–30% vol · 40–90 µm

ADHESIVE FORMULATIONS

PVA (craft grade) · Acrylic latex

SPRAY PRESSURE

1.4–3.6 bar

CUMULATIVE TO 2009

420 tested · 420 failed · 0 breakthroughs

100.00% failure · 0.00% success

IITHE FORMULATION EXPLORER

Fifty representative batches, drawn from the twenty thousand.

Each card is a pane that was sprayed, dried, walked around and judged. Filter by verdict, by era, or by what was in the suspension.

VERDICT
ERA
PARTICLE
SHOWING 50 OF 50

FM-00001

TESTED 2009

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Glass microspheres, PVA binder
NANO
Glass beads · 60 µm · 24% vol
ADHESIVE
PVA (craft grade)
SPRAY
2 bar · 60° · 20 cm

First pass. Craft-store glass beads in PVA; the pane went fully opaque. The medium announced its terms.

FM-00189

TESTED 2009

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Titanium dioxide, Acrylic latex
NANO
TiO₂ (anatase) · 3.1 µm · 9.1% vol
ADHESIVE
Water-borne acrylic
SPRAY
1.9 bar · 69° · 15 cm

PVA clouded within a week in 60% RH.

FM-00224

TESTED 2009

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Titanium dioxide, Acrylic latex
NANO
TiO₂ (anatase) · 3.1 µm · 10.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Water-borne acrylic
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 60° · 27 cm

Runs and sags at 30 cm; the binder never grabbed.

FM-00847

TESTED 2010

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Silicon oxide, Titanium dioxide, Organic binders
NANO
SiO₂ · 2.3 µm · 12% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic latex
SPRAY
2.6 bar · 70° · 24 cm

Excessive hotspot, delamination risk.

FM-01054

TESTED 2010

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Talc, Calcium carbonate, Acrylic latex
NANO
CaCO₃ · 6 µm · 22.3% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic latex
SPRAY
3.6 bar · 55° · 28 cm

Coating lifted whole when the pane was tilted.

FM-01062

TESTED 2010

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Talc, Calcium carbonate, Acrylic latex
NANO
TiO₂ (anatase) · 3.1 µm · 10.7% vol
ADHESIVE
Water-borne acrylic
SPRAY
3.5 bar · 58° · 20 cm

Runs and sags at 30 cm; the binder never grabbed.

FM-01353

TESTED 2011

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Zinc oxide, Silicon dioxide, Epoxy
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 1.8 µm · 5.4% vol
ADHESIVE
Epoxy (clear)
SPRAY
3 bar · 63° · 29 cm

Colour shift toward warm; TiO₂ scatter too strong.

FM-01962

TESTED 2011

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
Silicon dioxide (fumed), Titanium dioxide (rutile), Acrylic binder
NANO
SiO₂ (fumed) · 2.1 µm · 9.5% vol
ADHESIVE
Solvent-borne acrylic
SPRAY
2.4 bar · 80° · 22 cm

The first image that survived a walk-around. Hotspot still there, but bounded.

MTF

0.41

EXTINCTION

71.0%

TRANSMIT.

29.0%

FM-02172

TESTED 2011

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Zinc oxide, Silicon dioxide, Epoxy
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 1.8 µm · 8.9% vol
ADHESIVE
Two-part polyurethane
SPRAY
1.9 bar · 77° · 15 cm

Uneven build — 22 µm at centre, 9 µm at edges.

FM-02672

TESTED 2012

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Silicon dioxide, Titanium dioxide (rutile), Organic binders
NANO
SiO₂ (fumed) · 2.3 µm · 13.8% vol
ADHESIVE
Solvent-borne acrylic
SPRAY
1.9 bar · 88° · 29 cm

Adhesion failure: crosshatch test graded 0B.

FM-02699

TESTED 2012

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Aluminium oxide, Barium sulphate, Polyurethane
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 1.8 µm · 7.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Epoxy (clear)
SPRAY
2.2 bar · 74° · 24 cm

Excessive hotspot, delamination risk.

FM-03197

TESTED 2012

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Silicon dioxide (fumed), Acrylic binder
NANO
SiO₂ (fumed) · 2.3 µm · 11.3% vol
ADHESIVE
Two-part polyurethane
SPRAY
2.6 bar · 84° · 27 cm

Nanoparticle agglomeration; visible speckle at 1 m.

FM-03455

TESTED 2013

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Silicon dioxide, Titanium dioxide (rutile), Organic binders
NANO
SiO₂ (fumed) · 2.3 µm · 10.4% vol
ADHESIVE
Epoxy (clear)
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 90° · 28 cm

Flaked on thermal cycling, −10 °C to 60 °C.

FM-03586

TESTED 2013

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Aluminium oxide, Barium sulphate, Polyurethane
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 1.8 µm · 6.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Epoxy (clear)
SPRAY
2.2 bar · 74° · 25 cm

Flaked on thermal cycling, −10 °C to 60 °C.

FM-04414

TESTED 2013

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Silicon dioxide (fumed), Acrylic binder
NANO
SiO₂ (fumed) · 2.3 µm · 11.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Two-part polyurethane
SPRAY
3 bar · 74° · 30 cm

Adhesion failure: crosshatch test graded 0B.

FM-05136

TESTED 2014

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
Zirconium dioxide, Silicon dioxide, Polyurethane
NANO
SiO₂ nanospheres · 420 nm · 10.0% vol
ADHESIVE
Urethane-acrylic hybrid
SPRAY
2.5 bar · 90° · 26 cm

Viewing cone 150° with no visible speckle at 1 m.

MTF

0.52

EXTINCTION

76.7%

TRANSMIT.

33.7%

FM-05330

TESTED 2014

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Zirconium dioxide, Silicon dioxide, Polyurethane
NANO
SiO₂ nanospheres · 420 nm · 5.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Silicone-modified acrylic
SPRAY
3 bar · 76° · 27 cm

Adhesion failure: crosshatch test graded 0B.

FM-06108

TESTED 2014

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ nanospheres, Urethane-acrylic hybrid
NANO
ZrO₂ · 320 nm · 5.0% vol
ADHESIVE
Moisture-cure PU
SPRAY
1.8 bar · 76° · 19 cm

Uneven build — 22 µm at centre, 9 µm at edges.

FM-06973

TESTED 2015

FAILURE
PARTICLES
PMMA microbeads, Silicon dioxide, Silicone-modified acrylic
NANO
SiO₂ nanospheres · 420 nm · 11.0% vol
ADHESIVE
UV-cure acrylate
SPRAY
3 bar · 77° · 28 cm

Adhesion failure: crosshatch test graded 0B.

FM-07084

TESTED 2015

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Mica flakes, Titanium dioxide, UV-cure acrylate
NANO
ZrO₂ · 320 nm · 4.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Moisture-cure PU
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 77° · 30 cm

Uneven build — 22 µm at centre, 9 µm at edges.

FM-07462

TESTED 2015

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ nanospheres, Urethane-acrylic hybrid
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 600 nm · 5.8% vol
ADHESIVE
Moisture-cure PU
SPRAY
3.2 bar · 78° · 22 cm

Binder yellowed within 72 h under UV.

FM-08079

TESTED 2016

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
Mica flakes, Titanium dioxide, UV-cure acrylate
NANO
PMMA beads · 5 µm · 12.9% vol
ADHESIVE
Moisture-cure PU
SPRAY
2.1 bar · 84° · 29 cm

Extinction 98.9%. Two batches later the binder lot changed.

MTF

0.53

EXTINCTION

82.0%

TRANSMIT.

35.5%

FM-08091

TESTED 2016

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Zirconium dioxide, Silicon dioxide, Polyurethane
NANO
PMMA beads · 5 µm · 11.9% vol
ADHESIVE
Urethane-acrylic hybrid
SPRAY
2.2 bar · 89° · 20 cm

Uneven build — 22 µm at centre, 9 µm at edges.

FM-08776

TESTED 2016

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Indium tin oxide, Silicon dioxide, Acrylic binder
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 600 nm · 3.4% vol
ADHESIVE
Urethane-acrylic hybrid
SPRAY
3.2 bar · 83° · 24 cm

Moiré against a 4K pixel grid.

FM-09718

TESTED 2017

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Mica flakes, Titanium dioxide, UV-cure acrylate
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 600 nm · 5.7% vol
ADHESIVE
UV-cure acrylate
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 79° · 22 cm

Flaked on thermal cycling, −10 °C to 60 °C.

FM-09998

TESTED 2017

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Indium tin oxide, Silicon dioxide, Acrylic binder
NANO
SiO₂ nanospheres · 420 nm · 9.9% vol
ADHESIVE
Urethane-acrylic hybrid
SPRAY
3.1 bar · 88° · 22 cm

Solvent attacked the previous layer; wrinkle across the field.

FM-10588

TESTED 2017

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Indium tin oxide, Silicon dioxide, Acrylic binder
NANO
ZrO₂ · 320 nm · 4.0% vol
ADHESIVE
UV-cure acrylate
SPRAY
2.4 bar · 82° · 20 cm

Cure shrinkage cracked the film at 18 µm.

FM-11363

TESTED 2018

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
Hollow glass nanospheres, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
Hollow glass · 1.4 µm · 9.7% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.1 bar · 88° · 21 cm

Trace TiO₂ corrected the warm shift to neutral D65.

MTF

0.63

EXTINCTION

85.2%

TRANSMIT.

38.6%

FM-11431

TESTED 2018

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Cerium oxide, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
Hollow glass · 1.4 µm · 6.9% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 87° · 24 cm

Bimodal ratio drifted; speckle returned at 2 m.

FM-11628

TESTED 2018

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Hollow glass nanospheres, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 240 nm · 0.5% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 90° · 26 cm

Edge halo under off-axis projection at 35°.

FM-12752

TESTED 2019

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
Hollow glass nanospheres, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
Hollow glass · 1.4 µm · 8.7% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.9 bar · 87° · 25 cm

Transmittance and scatter balanced at a 15 µm build.

MTF

0.66

EXTINCTION

88.8%

TRANSMIT.

39.6%

FM-12926

TESTED 2019

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ nanospheres, Barium sulphate, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
SiO₂ · 180 nm · 6.4% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 90° · 19 cm

Trace TiO₂ overshot; D65 neutrality lost by 180 K.

FM-13210

TESTED 2019

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Hollow glass nanospheres, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
Hollow glass · 1.4 µm · 7.3% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 89° · 18 cm

Bimodal ratio drifted; speckle returned at 2 m.

FM-14140

TESTED 2020

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 240 nm · 0.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2.7 bar · 87° · 26 cm

Crosshatch adhesion 5B; survived 200 thermal cycles.

MTF

0.65

EXTINCTION

90.0%

TRANSMIT.

43.0%

FM-14219

TESTED 2020

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ nanospheres, Barium sulphate, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 240 nm · 0.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2 bar · 89° · 25 cm

Sol-gel cured glass-hard but clouded on the third day.

FM-15427

TESTED 2020

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Hollow glass nanospheres, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
SiO₂ · 180 nm · 6.6% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.3 bar · 86° · 20 cm

Sol-gel cured glass-hard but clouded on the third day.

FM-15521

TESTED 2021

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
Hollow glass · 1.4 µm · 9.3% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.2 bar · 90° · 22 cm

Crosshatch adhesion 5B; survived 200 thermal cycles.

MTF

0.72

EXTINCTION

92.7%

TRANSMIT.

42.6%

FM-15819

TESTED 2021

FAILURE
PARTICLES
Hollow glass nanospheres, Silicon dioxide, Sol-gel silica
NANO
SiO₂ · 320 nm · 4.8% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.4 bar · 89° · 22 cm

Edge halo under off-axis projection at 35°.

FM-16763

TESTED 2021

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ nanospheres, Barium sulphate, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
SiO₂ · 180 nm · 7.1% vol
ADHESIVE
Sol-gel silica
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 89° · 23 cm

Haze 4% over spec — binder lot variance.

FM-16873

TESTED 2022

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal 180/320 nm), TiO₂ trace, BaSO₄, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
BaSO₄ · 1.1 µm · 2.1% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid (lot B)
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 89° · 24 cm

Trace TiO₂ corrected the warm shift to neutral D65.

MTF

0.71

EXTINCTION

93.5%

TRANSMIT.

45.8%

FM-16883

TESTED 2022

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), BaSO₄, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
BaSO₄ · 1.1 µm · 1.7% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid
SPRAY
2.7 bar · 88° · 22 cm

Hotspot extinction stalled at 96.8%; the last 2% would not come.

FM-18066

TESTED 2022

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Sol-gel silica
NANO
BaSO₄ · 1.1 µm · 2.1% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2.3 bar · 89° · 22 cm

Sol-gel cured glass-hard but clouded on the third day.

FM-18478

TESTED 2023

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Sol-gel silica
NANO
SiO₂ (bimodal) · 180 / 320 nm · 6.1% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid (lot B)
SPRAY
2.5 bar · 90° · 22 cm

Bimodal SiO₂ flattened the gain curve; viewing cone widened to 120°.

MTF

0.76

EXTINCTION

95.6%

TRANSMIT.

47.8%

FM-19369

TESTED 2023

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal 180/320 nm), TiO₂ trace, BaSO₄, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
SiO₂ (bimodal) · 180 / 320 nm · 6.4% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid
SPRAY
2.6 bar · 90° · 24 cm

First formulation to survive 1,000 h UV without yellowing.

MTF

0.75

EXTINCTION

96.5%

TRANSMIT.

47.1%

FM-19393

TESTED 2023

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Sol-gel silica
NANO
BaSO₄ · 1.1 µm · 2.7% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2.3 bar · 88° · 24 cm

Bimodal ratio drifted; speckle returned at 2 m.

FM-19665

TESTED 2024

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Sol-gel silica
NANO
SiO₂ (bimodal) · 180 / 320 nm · 6.9% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid (lot B)
SPRAY
2.8 bar · 90° · 22 cm

Extinction 98.9%. Two batches later the binder lot changed.

MTF

0.79

EXTINCTION

99.5%

TRANSMIT.

46.8%

FM-19745

TESTED 2024

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal), TiO₂ trace, Sol-gel silica
NANO
TiO₂ (rutile) · 240 nm · 0.3% vol
ADHESIVE
Hybrid sol-gel / acrylic
SPRAY
2.7 bar · 88° · 22 cm

Image held from 3 m; hotspot bounded to a 6 cm disc.

MTF

0.78

EXTINCTION

98.3%

TRANSMIT.

46.9%

FM-19926

TESTED 2024

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal 180/320 nm), TiO₂ trace, BaSO₄, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
BaSO₄ · 1.1 µm · 3.0% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid
SPRAY
2.3 bar · 90° · 21 cm

Transmittance 51% but MTF fell below 0.7 — too little scatter.

FM-19983

TESTED 2024

FAILURE
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal 180/320 nm), TiO₂ trace, BaSO₄, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
SiO₂ (bimodal) · 180 / 320 nm · 6.8% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid (lot B)
SPRAY
2.4 bar · 90° · 22 cm

Seventeen batches from the end. Binder lot variance; haze 4% over spec. Scraped.

FM-20000

TESTED 2024

BREAKTHROUGH
PARTICLES
SiO₂ (bimodal 180/320 nm), TiO₂ trace, BaSO₄, Acrylic-urethane hybrid
NANO
SiO₂ (bimodal) · 180 / 320 nm · 6.8% vol
ADHESIVE
Acrylic-urethane hybrid (lot A)
SPRAY
2.4 bar · 90° · 22 cm

The window stayed a window. 48.2% transmittance, 99.3% hotspot extinction at a 15 µm build.

MTF

0.82

EXTINCTION

99.3%

TRANSMIT.

48.2%

IIITHE ONE THAT STAYED

FM-20000. The window stayed a window.

Nineteen thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine panes had been scraped back to clear glass. This one was not.

Spray gun applying the final PrismPixel Glass formulation to a transparent substrate

FM-20000

BREAKTHROUGH2024

PARTICLE BREAKDOWN

SiO₂ nanospheres180 nm4.1% vol
SiO₂ nanospheres320 nm2.7% vol
TiO₂ (rutile), trace240 nm0.4% vol
BaSO₄1.1 µm2.1% vol
Acrylic-urethane hybrid binder, lot Abalance

SPRAY METHODOLOGY

GUN
HVLP, 1.3 mm tip
PRESSURE
2.4 bar at the cap
ANGLE
90° to the substrate
DISTANCE
22 cm
PASSES
Three, cross-hatched, 40 min flash between
DRY FILM
15 µm · 72 h ambient cure

0.82

MTF @ 10 LP/MM

99.3%

HOTSPOT EXTINCTION

48.2%

TRANSMITTANCE

1.8%

HAZE

160°

VIEWING CONE

To my son, Charlie, who is now fifteen years old: I want you and the world to know that the fourteen years I spent upon this, the eighteen-hour days, the seven days a week that were poured into this work—they were all for you.

— THE RESEARCHER, ON THE NIGHT OF FM-20000

IVTHE CYCLE

Spray. Dry. Walk around. Evaluate. Scrape. Repeat.

There was no automation and no assistant. One gun, one rack, one projector, one razor. The cycle ran twenty thousand times.

  1. 1

    Spray

    HVLP gun, 1.3 mm tip. Three cross-hatched passes at arm's length.

  2. 2

    Substrate

    A pane of float glass, cleaned to a squeak and edge-lit.

  3. 3

    Dry

    Forty minutes on the rack. Flash-off, then a slow ambient cure.

  4. 4

    Walk around

    Projector on. A full circuit of the pane at one, two and three metres.

  5. 5

    Evaluate

    Hotspot, haze, speckle, colour shift, cone. A number for each; most were wrong.

  6. 6

    Scrape

    A steel razor and an hour. The pane returned to clear glass.

  7. Repeat

    Adjust one variable. Only one. Begin again.

The suspension

THE SUSPENSION

Nanoparticles, binder and solvent, swirled by hand before every batch.

The spray

THE SPRAY

One pass too wet and the film sagged; one too dry and it dusted.

The rack

THE RACK

Forty minutes of not touching it.

The walk-around

THE WALK-AROUND

The projector tells the truth from every angle at once.

The scrape

THE SCRAPE

Nineteen thousand seven hundred times, back to glass.

VTHE LEDGER

What fifteen years cost, in numbers.

0

TOTAL FORMULATIONS TESTED

0

FAILURES — 98.5%

0

BREAKTHROUGHS — 1.5%

0

YEARS OF ITERATION

0

INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER

Countless

PARTICLE COMBINATIONS